BOOB ALERT
Not mine.
I found this picture some days ago, while surfing through my blogroll.
Amanda Palmer (Dresden Dolls) and 4 other of her friends, celebrating for their new tent. Topless.
It’s a picture that makes me smile every time I see it. It’s natural, funny, and refreshing.
I like it because these are women like myself (normal), and they’re not afraid of doing something like that because they freaking want to, only because they lack model bodies – full, symetrical breasts with incredibly flat waists and a perfect tan.

I like it because they can use parts of their body in a fun way without hypersexualising them…
Look! their boobs are on public view! They’re out there! Hide them! You are disrespecting yourselves and tempting men!
I was recently reading a local magazine that featured a muslim woman defending their use of the Hijab (wish I could find the article online! Grrr! Sorry). I am not going to get deep into this, I’m NOT going to talk about the religion or the culture. I just wanted to note something the woman said about the Hijab. She basically says that by covering all her grown female parts, (mouth and ears included) she’s making sure that whenever she talks, people are paying attention to her words and not her sexuality.
Another article says:
“A female doctor, writer, electrician or plumber may be appreciated in the work environment for her skill, but is still basically seen as “just a woman.” But put her in Hijab so that what makes her a woman cannot be appraised and all of a sudden you are dealing with a person...”
Of course I’d hate to be treated as “just a woman“. I live in a culture that has lots of residual sexism in the minds of the average person. The housewife, the mother, the fragile rose that needs to be protected, cared for and marked as part of the territory. Women like to be roses and men like to own them.
I absolutely hate this, and it’s partly why I often feel like a stranger in this Latino culture I don’t belong to. But that’s another topic.
In my opinion; It is the sexist mindset, not the fact that I am a woman what would cause people to see me as “just a woman“.
Why would I ever have to hide it? And isn’t hiding it in such an active way actually highlighting the fact that there’s something forbidden in there?
That doesn’t mean I will post my boobs out here, or go outside in a see-through baby doll with fleshy glossy lips. (Hypersexualised me… I’ll leave that for other times… when I’m looking for a sexual objective).
I’m a female human. I have arms, legs eyes and boobs (o.O mind-blowing!) among a hundred other organs. I could wish that looking at boobs was as normal as looking at hands…
Of course, in most human cultures, the breasts are sexual… and that’s cool. But are they ONLY sexual? The lips and tongue can be sexual and can be a BIG part of sexuality. But, when you’re speaking or eating, are they sexual? (well, I don’t know what you’re into).
Some people tend to be very wary of women breastfeeding. But babies need to eat whenever they’re hungry, so the boob is going to pop out and scare you if you’re not expecting it. “Boobs are only sexual” comes into your unconcious mind, and this thought, plus the sight of a baby and milk and sucking will make it Gross for you.
Boobs can be beautiful in a very artistic way. Interesting shadows and lights. A very nice composition. I wouldn’t mind to be the model of this photo, and I wouldn’t feel like my privacy has been taken or that I’m being immoral or that I objectizise women or myself.
Boobs can also be left out for some fun whenever we want to, not sexual.
And finally, if we do want to use them in a sexual way, well, bring it on!
The World is Getting Better Everyday, and so is my life.
Today I ran into a person I know from uni. While talking to her I sensed how she felt the world is much worse now than say, 100 years ago. She mentioned things like pollution, overpopulation and an apparent corruption of ethics in most humans. Then she went on a religious rant about people getting away from God and such, but that’s beneath the point.
It’s not the first time I’ve heard people say that nowadays humanity is at its worst, and it’s falling even lower as we speak. And I’m not only talking about older people; It seems to be a collective perception. In Spanish, there’s a very popular saying that says “Todo Tiempo Pasado Fue Mejor”, which can be literally translated as “Every past time was better than now”. I don’t know if English speaking people have a similar saying.
Do you think that the past time was better? I don’t.
I think the world is getting better everyday. Maybe the air was less polluted back then, the rivers were cleaner, and definitely, there were fewer pregnant teenagers. However, the concept of people living quietly, respecting the neighbors, the children being obedient, while married couples never divorced, to me is like a fairy tale that has nothing to do with the real thing.
Lets take our time machine and go really back then. Cavemen could barely live, so they wouldn’t worry much about anything else that was not being killed and eating enough not to die before reproducing. The first civilizations created reservoirs of food and water, and safer living conditions. With this, they were able to go into other issues: war, diseases, hierarchy. A flu could kill you, as well as not listening to the current authority.
Let’s jump to European civilizations. The children mortality was still high as it could be, and men died in wars, and people kept dying of flu and tuberculosis. There was no freedom of speech. When the church gained more power, people died for speaking their minds. Women died for doing nothing! If you were a woman in the middle age, and someone didn’t like you, chances are they would accuse you of being a witch and you’d die. No discussion. The middle age lasted 1200 years! 1200 years and nothing changed whatsoever, no discoveries were made because of fear, so the same old things applied, and people kept dying and being abused. Renaissance and the illumination was a better time to live than middle age, sure, but the social hierarchies still played a role, the poverty killed thousands, and people kept dying of flu! Ever heard about an aunt saying they want to have their baby at home because “that’s how it was done before”?, Well, before the prenatal and perinatal death rate was HUGE. We have our babies in bubbles of protection now with the hospitals and vaccines and esterilizing practices. The prenatal and perinatal dead rate, as well as the dead rate of woman for obstetric causes is a marker of the health status of each country, and most developed countries make sure these markers stay low.
Let’s go back to the time machine and go into last century. Sexism, intolerance, and diseases. But this is when the clock starts to accelerate and the freedom is increased, and the minds start to shine.
Are you scared because of AIDS and cancer and how many people die because of it? Well, we are currently facing the lowest mortality rate ever as a species we’ve ever had. Overpopulation is a sign of our sucess as species and constitutes a new problem. As well as the obesity epidemy is a sign of our sucess at accumulating resources and safety. We’re winning too many trophies and we don’t know what to do with them. You think having a flu is easy? well, it is NOW.
Humans cause problems, but at the same time they try to fix them. Then some new problems arise, but humans are always paying attention. And the clock is moving faster than ever, and more solutions will be found. And more problems will arise.
Good or bad, humans will come up with a solution. If it means the biological beings eventually dying and humans making their way with technology and robots, that’s still a solution. Sounds scary, but, what would a person from the 18 century say about the internet?
When asked in what time would I want to reborn if I had the chance to, I would l say: Now, or maybe even: In The Future.
May the past stay very far from me.
*
Do you think the past was any better? When? and How?
If not, What do you think was the worst that has been left behind?
*
I’ll leave you with another one of the incredibly retarded flash animations that give me one-hour laughing fits every time.
Personal Victory
Wow, I have so many ideas for blogging. But I find myself unable to elaborate. Yesterday I typed continuously on my word processor, but after 2 or 3 hours, I decided to delete the file.
Last week I spent the whole time on bed, doing nothing. I didn’t want to have contact with anyone, I didn’t want to give explanations, I got away from everyone, it’s better that way.
If depression was like going deep in a dark sea of confusion and despair, right now I’m heading back to the surface. But there’s no one waiting for me to come back up. I can’t express how much I wish to have some deep contact with someone now, I want to hug someone and tell them that I have not drown after all! I have a sense of acomplishment I wish to share…
I don’t feel bad, after all, I know that this is something that matters to me and to me only.
And it’s still a happy moment, as sad as this post seems to sound.
About my friends
This was meant to be a comment for SULZ, but I decided to be selfish and use this good blog material for my own post. Also copying JUAN’s behaviour who was selfish before me.
The subject is how you treat friendships, and which concept applies to you: Are you a Universalist or a Particularist on regards to this? NOTE: Will appreciate it if you have further information in the subject. I am looking for good sources to read about this, so for now I will not add a link for it. I’d also appreciate it if you read Sulz post since this is my reply to it, and bear with me for now.
This is very interesting. I think I have heard about this concept somewhere, but I never paid too much attention until now. Right now it’s perfect for me to learn about this, because it’s something I’ve been thinking about recently… how do I treat my friendships and why.
Still, I don’t know if I can draw a line and just place myself on one side or the other. But I guess I’m much more of a Particularist. I will consider every situation taking on account the specific factors that apply to THAT situation, and will change my point of view if given new evidence. There is nothing that is Universal enough to be applied for every situation or relationship…
In regards to friendships, I am NOT an all-or-nothing person. On the contrary, everything is gradual and full of gray shades to the point I don’t think there’s anything white or black in this area. My opinion towards a particular friendship change according to situation and the changes are rarely definitive. I’m always open to learn why they do this or that, and I believe I can be extremely understanding, even when it hurts me. I have developed good empathy powers, and I have become able to place myself in the other person’s place until I almost forget my own point of view. Almost… I do value my happiness, and I’m not such a good friend at times. If I’m overwhelmed by something I’m likely to withdraw and not feel like interacting with the people around me, no matter how much I care. I’ve realized not everyone shares my ability to just understand the situations like I do with other people… and not everyone understands that even though I might withdraw from time to time, being pretty much oblivious to everything that is happening around me to the point I might not notice that you’re having a bad time if you don’t tell me. This does not mean I don’t care about you. If you could somehow let me know that you need me, you’ll realize that I’ve always been there and will probably not go away no matter what I do or what you do.
It’s not a sign that I can be stepped on and will be unconditional just because I want to stay friends with you. This would make me prone to getting slapped on the face all over the place several times. It would be a sign of neediness, and would make me extremely vulnerable to abuse.
I like to think that I like to decide what value I put in a relationship, depending on many different factors, but NOT depending on the level of correspondence of the other person. How I feel about YOU will be independent (as much as it can be) of how you feel about ME. If it happens to be equal, you will probably become my best friend, but it’s not the main objective (although desirable). I know I have friends who I love considerably more than I think they love me, but it doesn’t become a problem because I’m aware I don’t want to define my value of the friendship by trying to guess where the other person is. To me it is a game where you’ll most likely fail, if you’re expecting everyone to feel for you the same way you feel about them.
I might fall in love with you, and stay in love with you even if I know you’re not in love with me. It is completely independent. On a smaller scale it is like my blogroll. I place there the blogs I LOVE to read, not caring the less if they love reading mine the same way. I might feel like giving you a present, not caring the less if you’re giving me one back. I am not playing games with you, I am not playing a competition on who loves who more. I am going to love you based on everything but your correspondence. If you correspond me with the same level of love, awesome! But I’m still aware the dynamics might change anytime if new situations arise.
I am also aware that there are people who love me considerably more than I love them. And if they are Universalists, I’m sure it might become a problem…
and it has.
-
Archives
- October 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- November 2008 (9)
- October 2008 (12)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (12)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS





